Assessment Criterion 4 - Analysis and conclusions (15 marks)
This section should:
a describe what the data shows
b include analytical comments that relate the data to the original aim(s)
c identify, where appropriate, any links or relationships between different
data sets
d where relevant, consider the values and attitudes of people involved
e return to the original aim(s), and consider to what extent the question has
been answered, the problem solved or the hypothesis proved
f show an appreciation of the limitations of the study and suggest how it
could be improved or taken further.
Level One |
Makes statements describing the data. If relevant, there is some awareness of
the different attitudes of some of the individuals and groups involved. There
are some general concluding comments which have a link with the original aim(s). |
1-5 |
Level Two |
The data is described in detail, and at the upper end of this mark
range there is some genuinely analytical comment. If relevant, some
links/relationships between data sets, and/or the different attitudes of many of
the individuals or groups involved, are identified. Concluding comments derive
from the data collected, and there may be some awareness of the inherent
limitations of the study and/or suggestions for taking the study further. |
6-10 |
Level Three |
Data is analysed in detail, making links, where relevant, to appropriate
geographical theory. If quantitative analysis is attempted, it is used
accurately and appropriately. Identifies and shows relevance of any
links/relationships between data sets and/or the attitudes and values of most of
the parties involved. Draws sound conclusions, explicitly supported by evidence,
clearly related to the objectives of the study. Shows an awareness that
explanations may be incomplete, and suggests how the study could be
improved/taken further. |
11-15 |
|